Before coming to NC State, I was a visiting student of Automation Department at Tshinghua University from Mar. 2012 to May. 2013, where I worked with Dr. Feifei Gao, mainly focusing on signal processing in wireless communication networks. I earned my M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China, in Mar. 2012 and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Nanjing Tech University, China, in Jun. 2009. I was an intern at Software Engineering group of ABB Corporate Research Center US in 2016 summer.
My research topics mainly focus on how to apply next generation of AI techniques to help improve software quality and aid software process. Techniques that I'm interested in (but not limited to) are transfer learning, deep learning and search-based optimization. My research question is always: can we do "it" better and faster?
This paper explores DART, an algorithm especially selected to succeed for large ε software quality prediction problems. DART is remarkable simple yet, on experimentation, it dramatically out-performs three sets of state-of-the-art defect prediction methods.
Grid search has been widely used as a parameter tuning method in software engineering community. However, by taking defect prediction task as a case study, we find that differential evolution as a parameter tuner performs if not better, at least as good as grid search but it runs 210X faster.
LDA suffers from “order effects”. Applying differential evolution algorithm to tune LDA parameters will dramatically reduce clustering instability and it also leads to improved performances for supervised as well as unsupervised learning.
Our HDP approach conducts metric selection and metric matching to build a prediction model between projects with heterogeneous metric sets. Our empirical study on 28 subjects shows that about 68% of predictions using our approach outperform or are comparable to WPDP with statistical significance.
We applied differential evolution algorithm to explore the hyper-parameter space to learn the best optimal parameters for defect prediction, which improves learners' performance in most cases and terminates quickly.
Actionable analytics are those that humans can understand, and operationalize. What kind of data mining models generate such actionable analytics? According to psychological scientists, humans understand models that most match their own internal models, which they characterize as lists of “heuristic” (i.e., lists of very succinct rules). This paper assessed Fast-and-Frugal Tree for software analytics.
Deep learning methods are useful for high-dimensional data and are becoming widely used in many areas of so ware engineering. Deep learners utilizes extensive computational power and can take a long time to train– making it di cult to widely validate and repeat and improve their results. In this study, we apply local learning on the data sets. Such method is over 500 times faster than deep learning but has similar or better results.
This paper introduces Data-Driven Search-based Software Engineering (DSE), which combines insights from Mining Software Repositories (MSR) and Search-based Software Engineering (SBSE). This paper aims to answer the following three questions: (1) What are the various topics addressed by DSE? (2) What types of data are used by the researchers in this area? (3) What research approaches do researchers use? The paper brie y sets out to act as a practical guide to develop new DSE techniques and also to serve as a teaching resource.
This paper repeats and refutes Yang et al's FSE'16 paper (1) There is much variability in the efficacy of the Yang et al. models, some supervised data is required to prune weaker models. (2) When we repeat their analysis on a project-by-project basis, supervised methods are seen to work better.
SVM with a simple differential evolution-based parameter tuning can get better performance than deep learning(CNN) method for knowledge units relateness classification task on Stack Overflow. At the same, it is 84X faster than the deep learning method.
We find a "bellwether" effect in software analytics. Given N data sets, we find which one produces the best predictions on all the others. This "bellwether" data set is then used for all subsequent predictions.